<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Legal Book &#187; thursday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.the-legal-book.com/tag/thursday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com</link>
	<description>Legal product guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:45:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>AG Holder Defends DOJ In Flap Over Firearm Sting</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/ag-holder-defends-doj-in-flap-over-firearm-sting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/ag-holder-defends-doj-in-flap-over-firearm-sting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney-general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critics-the-doj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[embarrass-the-department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[furious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun-trafficking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not-involved]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operation-fast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telling-critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thursday]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/ag-holder-defends-doj-in-flap-over-firearm-sting/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[House Republicans demanded greater access Thursday to documents on the "Operation Fast and Furious" gun trafficking probe, accusing the Justice Department of hiding information that could embarrass the department. Attorney General Eric Holder Jr. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>House Republicans demanded greater access Thursday to documents on the &#8220;Operation Fast and Furious&#8221; gun trafficking probe, accusing the Justice Department of hiding information that could embarrass the department. Attorney General Eric Holder Jr. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/ag-holder-defends-doj-in-flap-over-firearm-sting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High Court Rules for Manufacturers in Asbestos Case</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/high-court-rules-for-manufacturers-in-asbestos-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/high-court-rules-for-manufacturers-in-asbestos-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 22:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos-case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broad-rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[from-liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiffs-were]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[potential-avenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protected-manufacturers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strict-products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thursday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unanimous-court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/high-court-rules-for-manufacturers-in-asbestos-case/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The California Supreme Court protected manufacturers from liability in a high-stakes asbestos case Thursday, foreclosing a potential avenue of recovery for plaintiffs. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The California Supreme Court protected manufacturers from liability in a high-stakes asbestos case Thursday, foreclosing a potential avenue of recovery for plaintiffs. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/high-court-rules-for-manufacturers-in-asbestos-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consumer Bureau&#8217;s Cordray Quickly Makes His Mark with Supervision Program</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/consumer-bureaus-cordray-quickly-makes-his-mark-with-supervision-program/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/consumer-bureaus-cordray-quickly-makes-his-mark-with-supervision-program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 04:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appointed-head]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer-financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cordray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[its-program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[officially-launched]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recess-appointment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[richard-cordray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thursday]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/consumer-bureaus-cordray-quickly-makes-his-mark-with-supervision-program/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Richard Cordray is wasting no time as the newly appointed head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. In a speech in Washington, D.C., Thursday, he defended his recess appointment and announced that the agency has officially launched its program for supervising non-banks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard Cordray is wasting no time as the newly appointed head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. In a speech in Washington, D.C., Thursday, he defended his recess appointment and announced that the agency has officially launched its program for supervising non-banks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/consumer-bureaus-cordray-quickly-makes-his-mark-with-supervision-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge Won&#8217;t Certify Class Over Google&#8217;s AdWords Program</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-wont-certify-class-over-googles-adwords-program/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-wont-certify-class-over-googles-adwords-program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 04:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[action-alleging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[another-key]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit-challenging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[purported-class]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thursday]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-wont-certify-class-over-googles-adwords-program/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has won another key victory in a lawsuit challenging its AdWords keyword advertising program. A California federal judge on Thursday -- relying on the U.S. Supreme Court's Wal-Mart ruling -- declined to certify a purported class action alleging deceptive and unfair advertising.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has won another key victory in a lawsuit challenging its AdWords keyword advertising program. A California federal judge on Thursday &#8212; relying on the U.S. Supreme Court&#8217;s Wal-Mart ruling &#8212; declined to certify a purported class action alleging deceptive and unfair advertising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-wont-certify-class-over-googles-adwords-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paul Weiss Beats Back Parmalat Appeal, Holds on to $431 Million Citigroup Win</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/paul-weiss-beats-back-parmalat-appeal-holds-on-to-431-million-citigroup-win/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/paul-weiss-beats-back-parmalat-appeal-holds-on-to-431-million-citigroup-win/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 21:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appellate-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defrauded-the-bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[former-bankers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[its-ongoing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jury-verdict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parmalat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quinn-emanuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thursday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[won-three]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[years-ago]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/paul-weiss-beats-back-parmalat-appeal-holds-on-to-431-million-citigroup-win/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Thursday a New Jersey appellate court upheld a jury verdict that Citigroup won three years ago on Citi's counterclaims that Parmalat defrauded the bank. The decision is a big blow for Quinn Emanuel in its ongoing pursuit of damages against Parmalat's former bankers and advisors.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Thursday a New Jersey appellate court upheld a jury verdict that Citigroup won three years ago on Citi&#8217;s counterclaims that Parmalat defrauded the bank. The decision is a big blow for Quinn Emanuel in its ongoing pursuit of damages against Parmalat&#8217;s former bankers and advisors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/paul-weiss-beats-back-parmalat-appeal-holds-on-to-431-million-citigroup-win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge Chides Prosecutors in FCPA Case Over Secret Notes</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-chides-prosecutors-in-fcpa-case-over-secret-notes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-chides-prosecutors-in-fcpa-case-over-secret-notes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 08:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criticized-prosecutors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effectively-snookered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign-bribery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge-on-thursday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kept-defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-dark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thursday]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-chides-prosecutors-in-fcpa-case-over-secret-notes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Saying the government "effectively snookered" the defense, a D.C. federal judge on Thursday criticized prosecutors for litigation tactics in a foreign bribery case that kept defense lawyers in the dark about key notes that belong to a government witness.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saying the government &#8220;effectively snookered&#8221; the defense, a D.C. federal judge on Thursday criticized prosecutors for litigation tactics in a foreign bribery case that kept defense lawyers in the dark about key notes that belong to a government witness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-chides-prosecutors-in-fcpa-case-over-secret-notes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Computer-Crime Statute Gets Ninth Circuit Workout</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/computer-crime-statute-gets-ninth-circuit-workout/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/computer-crime-statute-gets-ninth-circuit-workout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 08:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge-alex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oral-arguments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[repeatedly-challenged]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seemingly-innocuous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-scope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thursday]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/computer-crime-statute-gets-ninth-circuit-workout/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At oral arguments Thursday, 9th Circuit Chief Judge Alex Kozinski repeatedly challenged the Justice Department's position on the scope of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act -- a position that could lead to the criminalization of seemingly innocuous computer activity that runs afoul of employer policies or terms of use agreements.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At oral arguments Thursday, 9th Circuit Chief Judge Alex Kozinski repeatedly challenged the Justice Department&#8217;s position on the scope of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act &#8212; a position that could lead to the criminalization of seemingly innocuous computer activity that runs afoul of employer policies or terms of use agreements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/computer-crime-statute-gets-ninth-circuit-workout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hearing Concludes on Virginia Tech&#8217;s Challenge to $55K Fine for 2007 Shooting</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/hearing-concludes-on-virginia-techs-challenge-to-55k-fine-for-2007-shooting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/hearing-concludes-on-virginia-techs-challenge-to-55k-fine-for-2007-shooting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 07:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arguments-concluded]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[before-reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gunfire-rocked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[over-its]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rocked-the-virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state-university]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-university]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thursday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/hearing-concludes-on-virginia-techs-challenge-to-55k-fine-for-2007-shooting/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shortly before reports of gunfire rocked the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University campus Thursday, arguments concluded before an administrative judge in the university's challenge to a $55,000 fine over its handling of the April 16, 2007, shootings that left 33 people dead.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shortly before reports of gunfire rocked the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University campus Thursday, arguments concluded before an administrative judge in the university&#8217;s challenge to a $55,000 fine over its handling of the April 16, 2007, shootings that left 33 people dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/hearing-concludes-on-virginia-techs-challenge-to-55k-fine-for-2007-shooting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bucking Recommendation, Prosecutors Ask for Jail Time for Bonds</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/bucking-recommendation-prosecutors-ask-for-jail-time-for-bonds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/bucking-recommendation-prosecutors-ask-for-jail-time-for-bonds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 07:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[15-month-prison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advisory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barry-bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[below-the-advisory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[final-swing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[his-obstruction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obstruction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[punishment-below]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swing-at-barry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-advisory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thursday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[two-years]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/bucking-recommendation-prosecutors-ask-for-jail-time-for-bonds/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a filing Thursday, prosecutors took what could be a final swing at Barry Bonds, asking for a 15-month prison term and objecting to a pre-sentence report recommending two years' probation for his obstruction of justice conviction, a punishment below the advisory guidelines.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a filing Thursday, prosecutors took what could be a final swing at Barry Bonds, asking for a 15-month prison term and objecting to a pre-sentence report recommending two years&#8217; probation for his obstruction of justice conviction, a punishment below the advisory guidelines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/bucking-recommendation-prosecutors-ask-for-jail-time-for-bonds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attorney General Holder Under Fire For &#8216;Fast And Furious&#8217; Gun Operation</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/attorney-general-holder-under-fire-for-fast-and-furious-gun-operation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/attorney-general-holder-under-fire-for-fast-and-furious-gun-operation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 21:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney-general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[before-the-house]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[botched-gun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[furious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house-judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operation-fast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[repeatedly-called]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thursday]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/attorney-general-holder-under-fire-for-fast-and-furious-gun-operation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In testimony Thursday before the House Judiciary Committee, Attorney General Eric Holder Jr. criticized the "inflammatory and inappropriate rhetoric" swirling around "Operation Fast and Furious," a botched gun trafficking investigation that Holder himself has repeatedly called "fundamentally flawed."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In testimony Thursday before the House Judiciary Committee, Attorney General Eric Holder Jr. criticized the &#8220;inflammatory and inappropriate rhetoric&#8221; swirling around &#8220;Operation Fast and Furious,&#8221; a botched gun trafficking investigation that Holder himself has repeatedly called &#8220;fundamentally flawed.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/attorney-general-holder-under-fire-for-fast-and-furious-gun-operation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yelp Hires Cooley for $100 Million IPO</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/yelp-hires-cooley-for-100-million-ipo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/yelp-hires-cooley-for-100-million-ipo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 07:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[craig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filing-which]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[initial-public]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[its-upcoming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kenneth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review-site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock-or-how]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[team]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thursday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade-its]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/yelp-hires-cooley-for-100-million-ipo/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cooley attorneys are representing review site Yelp in its upcoming initial public offering. Business partner Kenneth Guernsey is leading the team, along with partner Craig Jacoby and associate David Peinsipp]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cooley attorneys are representing review site Yelp in its upcoming initial public offering. Business partner Kenneth Guernsey is leading the team, along with partner Craig Jacoby and associate David Peinsipp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/yelp-hires-cooley-for-100-million-ipo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Outlook Dim for Redevelopment Agencies at High Court</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/outlook-dim-for-redevelopment-agencies-at-high-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/outlook-dim-for-redevelopment-agencies-at-high-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 05:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[400-some-redevelopment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeared-divided]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget-fixes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court-on-thursday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[more-controversial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outlook-seemed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[their-fight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thursday]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/outlook-dim-for-redevelopment-agencies-at-high-court/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The California Supreme Court on Thursday appeared divided over whether to sign off on one of Gov. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The California Supreme Court on Thursday appeared divided over whether to sign off on one of Gov. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/outlook-dim-for-redevelopment-agencies-at-high-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fumo Gets Six More Months in Prison</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/fumo-gets-six-more-months-in-prison/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/fumo-gets-six-more-months-in-prison/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 05:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[additional-months]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exact-vengeance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[former-pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prison-on-thursday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[received-six]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thursday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vengeance-on-several]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/fumo-gets-six-more-months-in-prison/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former Pennsylvania state Sen. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former Pennsylvania state Sen. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/fumo-gets-six-more-months-in-prison/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TD Bank executive takes Fifth in Rothstein-related trial</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/td-bank-executive-takes-fifth-in-rothstein-related-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/td-bank-executive-takes-fifth-in-rothstein-related-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 05:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[former-regional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frank-spinosa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit-brought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ponzi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scott-rothstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-former]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-witness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thursday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vice-president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[witness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yes-man]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/td-bank-executive-takes-fifth-in-rothstein-related-trial/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Frank Spinosa, a former regional vice president for TD Bank who is accused of being Scott Rothstein's yes man, refused to answer any questions Thursday on the witness stand in the federal lawsuit brought by investors in the former lawyer's $1.2 billion Ponzi scheme.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank Spinosa, a former regional vice president for TD Bank who is accused of being Scott Rothstein&#8217;s yes man, refused to answer any questions Thursday on the witness stand in the federal lawsuit brought by investors in the former lawyer&#8217;s $1.2 billion Ponzi scheme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/td-bank-executive-takes-fifth-in-rothstein-related-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Pay for Delay&#8217; Deals Between Drug Makers Becoming More Subtle, Panel Concludes</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/pay-for-delay-deals-between-drug-makers-becoming-more-subtle-panel-concludes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/pay-for-delay-deals-between-drug-makers-becoming-more-subtle-panel-concludes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 01:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delay-settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[more-complicated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[name-drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thursday]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/pay-for-delay-deals-between-drug-makers-becoming-more-subtle-panel-concludes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pay for delay deals aren't dead, but they have become more complicated -- and more subtle. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pay for delay deals aren&#8217;t dead, but they have become more complicated &#8212; and more subtle. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/pay-for-delay-deals-between-drug-makers-becoming-more-subtle-panel-concludes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D.C. Judge Stops Proposed H&amp;R Block Merger With Tax Prep Company</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/d-c-judge-stops-proposed-hr-block-merger-with-tax-prep-company/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/d-c-judge-stops-proposed-hr-block-merger-with-tax-prep-company/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 08:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[287-million]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[block]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[explains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge-explains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[merger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proposed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proposed-acquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saying-the-proposed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sells-digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax-preparation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thursday]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/d-c-judge-stops-proposed-hr-block-merger-with-tax-prep-company/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal judge in Washington, D.C., on Thursday ruled against H&#038;R Block's proposed acquisition of a rival company that also sells digital do-it-yourself tax preparation products, saying the proposed $287 million merger would harm consumers. See related story: D.C. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A federal judge in Washington, D.C., on Thursday ruled against H&#038;R Block&#8217;s proposed acquisition of a rival company that also sells digital do-it-yourself tax preparation products, saying the proposed $287 million merger would harm consumers. See related story: D.C. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/d-c-judge-stops-proposed-hr-block-merger-with-tax-prep-company/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D.C. Judge Stops Proposed H&amp;R Block Merger With Tax Prep Company</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/d-c-judge-stops-proposed-hr-block-merger-with-tax-prep-company-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/d-c-judge-stops-proposed-hr-block-merger-with-tax-prep-company-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 08:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[287-million]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[block]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[explains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge-explains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[merger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proposed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proposed-acquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saying-the-proposed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sells-digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax-preparation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thursday]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/d-c-judge-stops-proposed-hr-block-merger-with-tax-prep-company-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal judge in Washington, D.C., on Thursday ruled against H&#038;R Block's proposed acquisition of a rival company that also sells digital do-it-yourself tax preparation products, saying the proposed $287 million merger would harm consumers. See related story: D.C. Judge Explains Decision to Stop H&#038;R Block's $287.5 Million TaxAct Merger]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A federal judge in Washington, D.C., on Thursday ruled against H&#038;R Block&#8217;s proposed acquisition of a rival company that also sells digital do-it-yourself tax preparation products, saying the proposed $287 million merger would harm consumers. See related story: D.C. Judge Explains Decision to Stop H&#038;R Block&#8217;s $287.5 Million TaxAct Merger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/d-c-judge-stops-proposed-hr-block-merger-with-tax-prep-company-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Standing Questioned in Action to Challenge Firm Ownership Rule</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/standing-questioned-in-action-to-challenge-firm-ownership-rule/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/standing-questioned-in-action-to-challenge-firm-ownership-rule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 07:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accepting-outside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consideration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expressed-skepticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firm-had]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investors-as-non]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[issues-were]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law-firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-lawyer-partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thursday]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/standing-questioned-in-action-to-challenge-firm-ownership-rule/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jacoby &#038; Meyers' challenge to the ban on law firms accepting outside investors as non-lawyer partners ran into trouble Thursday as a federal judge expressed skepticism that the firm had standing and that the issues were ripe for his consideration.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacoby &#038; Meyers&#8217; challenge to the ban on law firms accepting outside investors as non-lawyer partners ran into trouble Thursday as a federal judge expressed skepticism that the firm had standing and that the issues were ripe for his consideration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/standing-questioned-in-action-to-challenge-firm-ownership-rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>City Loses 1st Round on Cellphone Warning Law</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/city-loses-1st-round-on-cellphone-warning-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/city-loses-1st-round-on-cellphone-warning-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 20:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[city-attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[closely-watched]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[district-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first-amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first-round]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lost-the-first]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[match-over]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[novel-cellphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[over-the-city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thursday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[william-alsup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/city-loses-1st-round-on-cellphone-warning-law/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The San Francisco city attorney's office has lost the first round in what promises to be a closely watched match over the city's novel cellphone "right to know" ordinance. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The San Francisco city attorney&#8217;s office has lost the first round in what promises to be a closely watched match over the city&#8217;s novel cellphone &#8220;right to know&#8221; ordinance. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/city-loses-1st-round-on-cellphone-warning-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alsup Says Google Can&#8217;t Keep Email Under Wraps</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/alsup-says-google-cant-keep-email-under-wraps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/alsup-says-google-cant-keep-email-under-wraps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 06:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[its-battle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[its-bid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge-on-thursday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[over-the-java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thursday]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/alsup-says-google-cant-keep-email-under-wraps/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has lost its bid to shield an internal email in its battle with Oracle over the Java programing language. A federal judge on Thursday rejected Google's claims that the email, written by an engineer, was privileged and confidential.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has lost its bid to shield an internal email in its battle with Oracle over the Java programing language. A federal judge on Thursday rejected Google&#8217;s claims that the email, written by an engineer, was privileged and confidential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/alsup-says-google-cant-keep-email-under-wraps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law school asks judge to toss graduates&#8217; fraud claims</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/law-school-asks-judge-to-toss-graduates-fraud-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/law-school-asks-judge-to-toss-graduates-fraud-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 06:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim-the-school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dismiss-fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[four-graduates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motion-on-thursday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thomas-jefferson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thursday]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/law-school-asks-judge-to-toss-graduates-fraud-claims/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lawyers for the Thomas M. Cooley Law School filed a motion on Thursday to dismiss a suit filed by four graduates who claim the school manipulated postgraduate employment data]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lawyers for the Thomas M. Cooley Law School filed a motion on Thursday to dismiss a suit filed by four graduates who claim the school manipulated postgraduate employment data</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/law-school-asks-judge-to-toss-graduates-fraud-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alsup Weighs S.F.&#8217;s Cellphone Disclosure Ordinance</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/alsup-weighs-s-f-s-cellphone-disclosure-ordinance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/alsup-weighs-s-f-s-cellphone-disclosure-ordinance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 06:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphone-ordinance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first-amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heard-arguments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[over-whether]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postpone-implementation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[take-effect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-novel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thursday]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/alsup-weighs-s-f-s-cellphone-disclosure-ordinance/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a federal judge heard arguments Thursday over whether San Francisco's cellphone ordinance runs afoul of the First Amendment, the city agreed to the judge's request to postpone implementation of the novel "right to know" ordinance, set to take effect next week, until he issues an order.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a federal judge heard arguments Thursday over whether San Francisco&#8217;s cellphone ordinance runs afoul of the First Amendment, the city agreed to the judge&#8217;s request to postpone implementation of the novel &#8220;right to know&#8221; ordinance, set to take effect next week, until he issues an order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/alsup-weighs-s-f-s-cellphone-disclosure-ordinance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge Stumps Samsung&#8217;s Lawyers in Apple Patent Case</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-stumps-samsungs-lawyers-in-apple-patent-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-stumps-samsungs-lawyers-in-apple-patent-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 04:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[client]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galaxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guess-which]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[made-the-right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minutes-went]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[point]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[she-believes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[their-client]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thursday]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-stumps-samsungs-lawyers-in-apple-patent-case/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal judge said Thursday she believes Samsung's Galaxy tablets infringe Apple's iPad patents. To illustrate her point, she held up a Galaxy tablet and an iPad and asked lawyers for Samsung to guess which product was their client's. Several minutes went by before they made the right choice.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A federal judge said Thursday she believes Samsung&#8217;s Galaxy tablets infringe Apple&#8217;s iPad patents. To illustrate her point, she held up a Galaxy tablet and an iPad and asked lawyers for Samsung to guess which product was their client&#8217;s. Several minutes went by before they made the right choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-stumps-samsungs-lawyers-in-apple-patent-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GAO Recommends Stronger Debarment Programs in Federal Contracting</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/gao-recommends-stronger-debarment-programs-in-federal-contracting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/gao-recommends-stronger-debarment-programs-in-federal-contracting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 09:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aggressive-policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad-contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[half-dozen-federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[including-the-department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thursday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weed-out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weed-out-bad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/gao-recommends-stronger-debarment-programs-in-federal-contracting/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Senate and House released a new Government Accountability Office report on Thursday, criticizing a half-dozen federal agencies, including the Department of Justice, for lacking aggressive policies to weed out bad contractors and wasteful spending.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Senate and House released a new Government Accountability Office report on Thursday, criticizing a half-dozen federal agencies, including the Department of Justice, for lacking aggressive policies to weed out bad contractors and wasteful spending.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/gao-recommends-stronger-debarment-programs-in-federal-contracting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mergermarket Report: S&amp;C Leads in M&amp;A Work After Three Quarters</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/mergermarket-report-sc-leads-in-ma-work-after-three-quarters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/mergermarket-report-sc-leads-in-ma-work-after-three-quarters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 09:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[317-2-billion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cromwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firms-handling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first-nine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global-law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ranks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sullivan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thursday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[total-value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[year]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/mergermarket-report-sc-leads-in-ma-work-after-three-quarters/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Advising on M&#038;A deals with a total value of $317.2 billion through the first nine months of 2011, Sullivan &#038; Cromwell leads the ranks of global law firms handling such transactions so far this year, according to a report released Thursday by Mergermarket.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Advising on M&#038;A deals with a total value of $317.2 billion through the first nine months of 2011, Sullivan &#038; Cromwell leads the ranks of global law firms handling such transactions so far this year, according to a report released Thursday by Mergermarket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/mergermarket-report-sc-leads-in-ma-work-after-three-quarters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

