Mar 15, 2010 0
Full 1st Circuit Rules Prospectus Statements Are Not Attributable to Executives for 10(b)(5) Purposes
The 1st Circuit recently issued an en banc opinion that rejected the U.S.
| Independent review site since 2002 | : 45,639 product reviews |
The Legal Book
Guiding you through today's legal questions |
|
|
Traffic Tickets Secrets
Learn how to beat any speeding ticket, with an easy, proven, |
|
![]() |
Civil Records.org
This recognised and trusted online records information provider |
|
![]() |
Reverse Phone Check
Find a comprehensive amount of public records information, just |
|
![]() |
Privacy Control
Protect your identity, prevent phishing scams, spam, adware, spyware |
|
![]() |
Police Oral Interview Coaching
Learn the tools you need to pass the most difficult part of |
|
Mar 15, 2010 0
The 1st Circuit recently issued an en banc opinion that rejected the U.S.
Feb 11, 2010 0
The Judicial Confirmation Network, which has been a significant conservative voice in recent Supreme Court confirmation battles, is expanding its mission and adding urgency to its name; it will now be called the Judicial Crisis Network.
Dec 4, 2009 0
The prosecutions of attorney Robert Simels and his former associate Arienne Irving, both of whom were convicted in August of conspiring to threaten witnesses, came to very different conclusions on Friday. A New York federal judge sentenced Simels to 14 years in federal prison and a $225,000 fine. As for Irving, 3 1/2 hours before the sentencing, the judge granted her Rule 29 motion, throwing out the jury’s verdict and dismissing her case.
Oct 12, 2009 0
By limiting the consequences of inadvertent production, Rule 502 of the Federal Rules of Evidence aimed to reduce the burden of conducting expensive preproduction privilege reviews. While the rule provided greater protection against waiver, it failed to deliver large cost savings.
Sep 29, 2009 0
In determining Debevoise & Plimpton should not be removed as counsel in a case where several of its lawyers may be called as witnesses, an appellate court has issued a “new formulation” of the rule requiring attorneys’ disqualification for a conflict of interest. The 2nd Circuit ruled that a firm “can be disqualified by imputation only if the movant proves by clear and convincing evidence” that the witness will give testimony prejudicial to the client and that the “integrity of the judicial system” will suffer as a result.