<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Legal Book &#187; rule</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.the-legal-book.com/tag/rule/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com</link>
	<description>Legal product guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 06:16:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>No Cameras Allowed for Scalia Speech at Duquesne</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/no-cameras-allowed-for-scalia-speech-at-duquesne/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/no-cameras-allowed-for-scalia-speech-at-duquesne/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 07:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[centennial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duquesne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usually-keeps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/no-cameras-allowed-for-scalia-speech-at-duquesne/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia usually keeps cameras from recording his remarks and events. But extending the rule to the highly public celebration marking the centennial of Duquesne University School of Law and the justice's own 25 years on the Court seems to take the practice to a new level.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia usually keeps cameras from recording his remarks and events. But extending the rule to the highly public celebration marking the centennial of Duquesne University School of Law and the justice&#8217;s own 25 years on the Court seems to take the practice to a new level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/no-cameras-allowed-for-scalia-speech-at-duquesne/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chamber files suit over new labor posters</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/chamber-files-suit-over-new-labor-posters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/chamber-files-suit-over-new-labor-posters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 07:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new-rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nlrb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nothing-more]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation-run]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robin-conrad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/chamber-files-suit-over-new-labor-posters/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is suing the NLRB over a new rule that will require employers to display an 11-by-17-inch poster that tells workers about their rights to unionize]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is suing the NLRB over a new rule that will require employers to display an 11-by-17-inch poster that tells workers about their rights to unionize</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/chamber-files-suit-over-new-labor-posters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6 Factors Help Avoid an E-Discovery Disaster</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/6-factors-help-avoid-an-e-discovery-disaster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/6-factors-help-avoid-an-e-discovery-disaster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 04:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[party-should]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spend-more]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[starting-point]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stored-information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-rule]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/6-factors-help-avoid-an-e-discovery-disaster/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The starting point for any e-discovery is the rule of proportionality -- a party should not be compelled to spend more to produce electronically stored information than the case is worth. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The starting point for any e-discovery is the rule of proportionality &#8212; a party should not be compelled to spend more to produce electronically stored information than the case is worth. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/6-factors-help-avoid-an-e-discovery-disaster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>N.J. Fee-Shifting Rule Held Applicable to Out-of-State Coverage Disputes</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/n-j-fee-shifting-rule-held-applicable-to-out-of-state-coverage-disputes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/n-j-fee-shifting-rule-held-applicable-to-out-of-state-coverage-disputes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 03:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court-rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees-applies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[its-insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jersey-supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[once-successful]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recover-legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[takes-place]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[then-coming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/n-j-fee-shifting-rule-held-applicable-to-out-of-state-coverage-disputes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A New Jersey court rule that allows insureds who prevail in coverage disputes to recover legal fees applies even when that litigation takes place out of state, the New Jersey Supreme Court has held. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A New Jersey court rule that allows insureds who prevail in coverage disputes to recover legal fees applies even when that litigation takes place out of state, the New Jersey Supreme Court has held. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/n-j-fee-shifting-rule-held-applicable-to-out-of-state-coverage-disputes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Front Opens in Dispute Between ABA, FTC</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/new-front-opens-in-dispute-between-aba-ftc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/new-front-opens-in-dispute-between-aba-ftc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 08:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal-trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latest-dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers-out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prevent-home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[says-the-rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theft-should]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/new-front-opens-in-dispute-between-aba-ftc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The American Bar Association and the Federal Trade Commission have been battling for a year over whether regulations designed to prevent identity theft should apply to lawyers. Now, they're tangling again, this time, over regulations aimed at mortgage fraud. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The American Bar Association and the Federal Trade Commission have been battling for a year over whether regulations designed to prevent identity theft should apply to lawyers. Now, they&#8217;re tangling again, this time, over regulations aimed at mortgage fraud. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/new-front-opens-in-dispute-between-aba-ftc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Full 1st Circuit Rules Prospectus Statements Are Not Attributable to Executives for 10(b)(5) Purposes</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/full-1st-circuit-rules-prospectus-statements-are-not-attributable-to-executives-for-10b5-purposes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/full-1st-circuit-rules-prospectus-statements-are-not-attributable-to-executives-for-10b5-purposes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 05:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exchange-commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expansive-interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[purchase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recently-issued]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-purchase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[untrue-statements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upholding-the-sec]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/full-1st-circuit-rules-prospectus-statements-are-not-attributable-to-executives-for-10b5-purposes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 1st Circuit recently issued an en banc opinion that rejected the U.S. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 1st Circuit recently issued an en banc opinion that rejected the U.S. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/full-1st-circuit-rules-prospectus-statements-are-not-attributable-to-executives-for-10b5-purposes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservative Judicial Group Moves Into Crisis Mode</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/conservative-judicial-group-moves-into-crisis-mode/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/conservative-judicial-group-moves-into-crisis-mode/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 05:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adding-urgency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial-crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[take-on-state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[well-as-federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[will-take]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/conservative-judicial-group-moves-into-crisis-mode/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Judicial Confirmation Network, which has been a significant conservative voice in recent Supreme Court confirmation battles, is expanding its mission and adding urgency to its name; it will now be called the Judicial Crisis Network. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Judicial Confirmation Network, which has been a significant conservative voice in recent Supreme Court confirmation battles, is expanding its mission and adding urgency to its name; it will now be called the Judicial Crisis Network. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/conservative-judicial-group-moves-into-crisis-mode/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defense Attorney Gets 14 Years in Prison for Conspiring to Threaten Witnesses</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/defense-attorney-gets-14-years-in-prison-for-conspiring-to-threaten-witnesses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/defense-attorney-gets-14-years-in-prison-for-conspiring-to-threaten-witnesses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 04:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arienne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arienne-irving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal-prison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hours-before]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert-simels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sentencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-sentencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[throwing-out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[very-different]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/defense-attorney-gets-14-years-in-prison-for-conspiring-to-threaten-witnesses/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The prosecutions of attorney Robert Simels and his former associate Arienne Irving, both of whom were convicted in August of conspiring to threaten witnesses, came to very different conclusions on Friday. A New York federal judge sentenced Simels to 14 years in federal prison and a $225,000 fine. As for Irving, 3 1/2 hours before the sentencing, the judge granted her Rule 29 motion, throwing out the jury's verdict and dismissing her case.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The prosecutions of attorney Robert Simels and his former associate Arienne Irving, both of whom were convicted in August of conspiring to threaten witnesses, came to very different conclusions on Friday. A New York federal judge sentenced Simels to 14 years in federal prison and a $225,000 fine. As for Irving, 3 1/2 hours before the sentencing, the judge granted her Rule 29 motion, throwing out the jury&#8217;s verdict and dismissing her case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/defense-attorney-gets-14-years-in-prison-for-conspiring-to-threaten-witnesses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FRE 502: One Year Later</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/fre-502-one-year-later/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/fre-502-one-year-later/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 05:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[burden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conducting-expensive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consequences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deliver-large]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal-rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[provided-greater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reduce-the-burden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-rule]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/fre-502-one-year-later/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By limiting the consequences of inadvertent production, Rule 502 of the Federal Rules of Evidence aimed to reduce the burden of conducting expensive preproduction privilege reviews. While the rule provided greater protection against waiver, it failed to deliver large cost savings.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By limiting the consequences of inadvertent production, Rule 502 of the Federal Rules of Evidence aimed to reduce the burden of conducting expensive preproduction privilege reviews. While the rule provided greater protection against waiver, it failed to deliver large cost savings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/fre-502-one-year-later/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;New Formulation&#8217; on Conflicts Returns Debevoise to $8 Billion MetLife Case</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/new-formulation-on-conflicts-returns-debevoise-to-8-billion-metlife-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/new-formulation-on-conflicts-returns-debevoise-to-8-billion-metlife-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appellate-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[client]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debevoise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[its-lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new-formulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plimpton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[should-not]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-movant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[will-suffer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/new-formulation-on-conflicts-returns-debevoise-to-8-billion-metlife-case/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In determining Debevoise &#038; Plimpton should not be removed as counsel in a case where several of its lawyers may be called as witnesses, an appellate court has issued a "new formulation" of the rule requiring attorneys' disqualification for a conflict of interest. The 2nd Circuit ruled that a firm "can be disqualified by imputation only if the movant proves by clear and convincing evidence" that the witness will give testimony prejudicial to the client and that the "integrity of the judicial system" will suffer as a result.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In determining Debevoise &#038; Plimpton should not be removed as counsel in a case where several of its lawyers may be called as witnesses, an appellate court has issued a &#8220;new formulation&#8221; of the rule requiring attorneys&#8217; disqualification for a conflict of interest. The 2nd Circuit ruled that a firm &#8220;can be disqualified by imputation only if the movant proves by clear and convincing evidence&#8221; that the witness will give testimony prejudicial to the client and that the &#8220;integrity of the judicial system&#8221; will suffer as a result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/new-formulation-on-conflicts-returns-debevoise-to-8-billion-metlife-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court Lays Down Law on Jury Internet Use</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/court-lays-down-law-on-jury-internet-use/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/court-lays-down-law-on-jury-internet-use/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 03:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[became-clear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal-trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entire-panel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[francisco-superior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jury-selection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new-rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[potential-jurors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweet-or-conduct]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/court-lays-down-law-on-jury-internet-use/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new rule proposed by San Francisco Superior Court would remind potential jurors not to blog, Tweet or conduct Internet research about cases. The need for the rule became clear to the court during a jury selection in a criminal trial, when an entire panel of 600 jurors had to be excused.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new rule proposed by San Francisco Superior Court would remind potential jurors not to blog, Tweet or conduct Internet research about cases. The need for the rule became clear to the court during a jury selection in a criminal trial, when an entire panel of 600 jurors had to be excused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/court-lays-down-law-on-jury-internet-use/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

