<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Legal Book &#187; plaintiffs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.the-legal-book.com/tag/plaintiffs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com</link>
	<description>Legal product guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:37:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Citing Morrison (and Surprising No One), N.Y. Judge Tosses Securities Claims by Individual Vivendi Shareholders</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/citing-morrison-and-surprising-no-one-n-y-judge-tosses-securities-claims-by-individual-vivendi-shareholders/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/citing-morrison-and-surprising-no-one-n-y-judge-tosses-securities-claims-by-individual-vivendi-shareholders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 07:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morrison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silver-lining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-claims]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/citing-morrison-and-surprising-no-one-n-y-judge-tosses-securities-claims-by-individual-vivendi-shareholders/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal judge has dismissed individual investors' securities claims against Vivendi related to ordinary shares they purchased on the Paris Bourse, finding that the claims are barred by the U.S. Supreme Court's Morrison decision]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A federal judge has dismissed individual investors&#8217; securities claims against Vivendi related to ordinary shares they purchased on the Paris Bourse, finding that the claims are barred by the U.S. Supreme Court&#8217;s Morrison decision</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/citing-morrison-and-surprising-no-one-n-y-judge-tosses-securities-claims-by-individual-vivendi-shareholders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suits Allege Lilly Failed To Warn of Darvocet&#8217;s and Darvon&#8217;s Health Risks</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/suits-allege-lilly-failed-to-warn-of-darvocets-and-darvons-health-risks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/suits-allege-lilly-failed-to-warn-of-darvocets-and-darvons-health-risks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 04:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claiming-it-failed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[darvon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drugs-were]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nine-suits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[painkillers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/suits-allege-lilly-failed-to-warn-of-darvocets-and-darvons-health-risks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former users of Darvocet and Darvon are suing Eli Lilly, claiming it failed to warn them that the painkillers carried the risk of serious heart problems. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former users of Darvocet and Darvon are suing Eli Lilly, claiming it failed to warn them that the painkillers carried the risk of serious heart problems. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/suits-allege-lilly-failed-to-warn-of-darvocets-and-darvons-health-risks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plaintiffs Vow to Fight for Deal After HSBC Bows Out of Settlement with Madoff Feeder Fund Investors</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/plaintiffs-vow-to-fight-for-deal-after-hsbc-bows-out-of-settlement-with-madoff-feeder-fund-investors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/plaintiffs-vow-to-fight-for-deal-after-hsbc-bows-out-of-settlement-with-madoff-feeder-fund-investors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 07:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[belgian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bernard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bernard-madoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class-actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hsbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-case]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/plaintiffs-vow-to-fight-for-deal-after-hsbc-bows-out-of-settlement-with-madoff-feeder-fund-investors/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HSBC has decided to walk away from the proposed $62.5 million deal reached with Bernard Madoff feeder fund investors last year, terminating an agreement to partially resolve a set of class actions brought by investors in Irish and Belgian funds. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HSBC has decided to walk away from the proposed $62.5 million deal reached with Bernard Madoff feeder fund investors last year, terminating an agreement to partially resolve a set of class actions brought by investors in Irish and Belgian funds. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/plaintiffs-vow-to-fight-for-deal-after-hsbc-bows-out-of-settlement-with-madoff-feeder-fund-investors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seventh Circuit Boosts Antitrust Class Actions by Reversing Dismissal of Chicago Hospital Suit</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/seventh-circuit-boosts-antitrust-class-actions-by-reversing-dismissal-of-chicago-hospital-suit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/seventh-circuit-boosts-antitrust-class-actions-by-reversing-dismissal-of-chicago-hospital-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 07:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust-class]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[certification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dismissal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[its-rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[northshore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[other-class]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[should-help]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/seventh-circuit-boosts-antitrust-class-actions-by-reversing-dismissal-of-chicago-hospital-suit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A 7th Circuit panel has reversed the dismissal of an antitrust class action against Northshore University Health System. The ruling, which allows the plaintiffs to pursue their claim that Northshore illegally inflated its rates after a merger, should help other class actions get past the certification stage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A 7th Circuit panel has reversed the dismissal of an antitrust class action against Northshore University Health System. The ruling, which allows the plaintiffs to pursue their claim that Northshore illegally inflated its rates after a merger, should help other class actions get past the certification stage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/seventh-circuit-boosts-antitrust-class-actions-by-reversing-dismissal-of-chicago-hospital-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawyer&#8217;s Distortion of Liability  Leads to Reversal of $25M Med-Mal Verdict</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/lawyers-distortion-of-liability-leads-to-reversal-of-25m-med-mal-verdict/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/lawyers-distortion-of-liability-leads-to-reversal-of-25m-med-mal-verdict/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 08:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affirmed-the-setting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney-misstated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[because-the-plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court-on-wednesday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[million-medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partly-because]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[setting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state-appellate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-plaintiffs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/lawyers-distortion-of-liability-leads-to-reversal-of-25m-med-mal-verdict/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A New Jersey state appellate court on Wednesday affirmed the setting aside of a $25 million medical malpractice verdict, partly because the plaintiffs attorney misstated an expert's statistical testimony.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A New Jersey state appellate court on Wednesday affirmed the setting aside of a $25 million medical malpractice verdict, partly because the plaintiffs attorney misstated an expert&#8217;s statistical testimony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/lawyers-distortion-of-liability-leads-to-reversal-of-25m-med-mal-verdict/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Judge Approves $35.5 Mil. Antitrust Settlement</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/federal-judge-approves-35-5-mil-antitrust-settlement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/federal-judge-approves-35-5-mil-antitrust-settlement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 19:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11-75-million]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class-action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[million-settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product-manufacturers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-plaintiffs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/federal-judge-approves-35-5-mil-antitrust-settlement/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal judge has approved a $35 million settlement in a class action in which plaintiffs claimed Babies "R" Us and baby product manufacturers engaged in violations of antitrust law. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A federal judge has approved a $35 million settlement in a class action in which plaintiffs claimed Babies &#8220;R&#8221; Us and baby product manufacturers engaged in violations of antitrust law. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/federal-judge-approves-35-5-mil-antitrust-settlement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Birther&#8217; Claims Rejected by Ninth Circuit</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/birther-claims-rejected-by-ninth-circuit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/birther-claims-rejected-by-ninth-circuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 02:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court-held]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal-appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new-blow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panel-rejected]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president-obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president-were]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[serve-as-president]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/birther-claims-rejected-by-ninth-circuit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Birthers" who argue that President Obama wasn't born in the U.S. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Birthers&#8221; who argue that President Obama wasn&#8217;t born in the U.S. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/birther-claims-rejected-by-ninth-circuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kirkland Can&#8217;t Stop Judge from Certifying Stock-Drop Class Action Against Medtronic</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/kirkland-cant-stop-judge-from-certifying-stock-drop-class-action-against-medtronic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/kirkland-cant-stop-judge-from-certifying-stock-drop-class-action-against-medtronic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 05:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accurately-represented]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fudged-the-testimony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge-on-monday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medtronic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shareholder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock-drop-suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testimony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-testimony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whether-the-plaintiffs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/kirkland-cant-stop-judge-from-certifying-stock-drop-class-action-against-medtronic/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite claims by Medtronic that plaintiffs lawyers in a stock-drop suit had fudged the testimony of 13 confidential witnesses, a federal judge on Monday certified the shareholder class, ruling that it was "premature" to determine whether the plaintiffs had accurately represented witnesses' testimony.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite claims by Medtronic that plaintiffs lawyers in a stock-drop suit had fudged the testimony of 13 confidential witnesses, a federal judge on Monday certified the shareholder class, ruling that it was &#8220;premature&#8221; to determine whether the plaintiffs had accurately represented witnesses&#8217; testimony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/kirkland-cant-stop-judge-from-certifying-stock-drop-class-action-against-medtronic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Circuit Rejects AOL Privacy Settlement, Citing Random Beneficiaries</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/circuit-rejects-aol-privacy-settlement-citing-random-beneficiaries-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/circuit-rejects-aol-privacy-settlement-citing-random-beneficiaries-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 07:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charities-had]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class-action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts-should]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doling-out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money-under]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[more-careful]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saying-the-charities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/circuit-rejects-aol-privacy-settlement-citing-random-beneficiaries-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 9th Circuit has rejected a class action settlement that called for AOL to give $110,000 to random charities, saying the charities had nothing to do with the plaintiffs' email privacy claims, and sending a message that courts should be more careful in doling out money under the cy pres doctrine.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 9th Circuit has rejected a class action settlement that called for AOL to give $110,000 to random charities, saying the charities had nothing to do with the plaintiffs&#8217; email privacy claims, and sending a message that courts should be more careful in doling out money under the cy pres doctrine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/circuit-rejects-aol-privacy-settlement-citing-random-beneficiaries-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Circuit Rejects AOL Privacy Settlement, Citing Random Beneficiaries</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/circuit-rejects-aol-privacy-settlement-citing-random-beneficiaries/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/circuit-rejects-aol-privacy-settlement-citing-random-beneficiaries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 07:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charities-had]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class-action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts-should]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doling-out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money-under]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[more-careful]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saying-the-charities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/circuit-rejects-aol-privacy-settlement-citing-random-beneficiaries/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 9th Circuit has rejected a class action settlement that called for AOL to give $110,000 to random charities, saying the charities had nothing to do with the plaintiffs' email privacy claims, and sending a message that courts should be more careful in doling out money under the cy pres doctrine.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 9th Circuit has rejected a class action settlement that called for AOL to give $110,000 to random charities, saying the charities had nothing to do with the plaintiffs&#8217; email privacy claims, and sending a message that courts should be more careful in doling out money under the cy pres doctrine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/circuit-rejects-aol-privacy-settlement-citing-random-beneficiaries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge Green-Lights Claims Against U.S. Auditor in China Expert Technology Class Action</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-green-lights-claims-against-u-s-auditor-in-china-expert-technology-class-action/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-green-lights-claims-against-u-s-auditor-in-china-expert-technology-class-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 07:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china-expert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class-action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evade-securities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limit-the-plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pkf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-green-lights-claims-against-u-s-auditor-in-china-expert-technology-class-action/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lawyers for auditor PKF New York hoped to use the Supreme Court's Janus ruling to evade securities claims in a class action targeting China Expert Technology, but a New York federal judge wasn't persuaded. Separately, the judge refused to limit the plaintiffs' discovery efforts in China.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lawyers for auditor PKF New York hoped to use the Supreme Court&#8217;s Janus ruling to evade securities claims in a class action targeting China Expert Technology, but a New York federal judge wasn&#8217;t persuaded. Separately, the judge refused to limit the plaintiffs&#8217; discovery efforts in China.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-green-lights-claims-against-u-s-auditor-in-china-expert-technology-class-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge dismisses Deepwater Horizon-related claims</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-dismisses-deepwater-horizon-related-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-dismisses-deepwater-horizon-related-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 04:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[begun-fighting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deepwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-operators]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-dismisses-deepwater-horizon-related-claims/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal judge's dismissal of claims against the operators of emergency rescue boats that responded to the fire on the Deepwater Horizon oil rig has "delighted" the defense but seems likely to provoke an appeal by the plaintiffs. Meanwhile, they have begun fighting over what the judge actually meant.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A federal judge&#8217;s dismissal of claims against the operators of emergency rescue boats that responded to the fire on the Deepwater Horizon oil rig has &#8220;delighted&#8221; the defense but seems likely to provoke an appeal by the plaintiffs. Meanwhile, they have begun fighting over what the judge actually meant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-dismisses-deepwater-horizon-related-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawyer&#8217;s Decamping from Defense to Plaintiffs&#8217; Firm Gets Latter Disqalified</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/lawyers-decamping-from-defense-to-plaintiffs-firm-gets-latter-disqalified/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/lawyers-decamping-from-defense-to-plaintiffs-firm-gets-latter-disqalified/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 02:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[because-the-attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[even-though]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[file]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primary-responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-file]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warranted-because]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/lawyers-decamping-from-defense-to-plaintiffs-firm-gets-latter-disqalified/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Side-switching by a defense lawyer has led to disqualification of the plaintiffs firm, even though she was there only about a month. The entire firm's disqualification is warranted because the attorney "had 'primary responsibility' even though she was not the 'supervising attorney' on the file," the judge said.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Side-switching by a defense lawyer has led to disqualification of the plaintiffs firm, even though she was there only about a month. The entire firm&#8217;s disqualification is warranted because the attorney &#8220;had &#8216;primary responsibility&#8217; even though she was not the &#8217;supervising attorney&#8217; on the file,&#8221; the judge said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/lawyers-decamping-from-defense-to-plaintiffs-firm-gets-latter-disqalified/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McKesson Settles Drug Pricing Class Action for $82 Million</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/mckesson-settles-drug-pricing-class-action-for-82-million/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/mckesson-settles-drug-pricing-class-action-for-82-million/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 02:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[causing-plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflated-average]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers-missed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[much-bigger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay-outsized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resolve-claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[under-government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/mckesson-settles-drug-pricing-class-action-for-82-million/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[McKesson has agreed to pay $82 million to resolve claims that it inflated average wholesale prices for its drugs, causing plaintiffs to pay outsized reimbursements under government health care programs. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McKesson has agreed to pay $82 million to resolve claims that it inflated average wholesale prices for its drugs, causing plaintiffs to pay outsized reimbursements under government health care programs. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/mckesson-settles-drug-pricing-class-action-for-82-million/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Circuit Pares Emery Firm&#8217;s Fee in Favor of Plaintiffs&#8217; Committee</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/circuit-pares-emery-firms-fee-in-favor-of-plaintiffs-committee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/circuit-pares-emery-firms-fee-in-favor-of-plaintiffs-committee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 06:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[among-attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emery-celli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fee-dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[its-fee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plane-over]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-2nd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tuesday]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/circuit-pares-emery-firms-fee-in-favor-of-plaintiffs-committee/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The long-running fee dispute among attorneys who represented the families of victims of the 1988 bombing of a plane over Lockerbie, Scotland, was brought to an end Tuesday by the 2nd Circuit, which ordered Emery Celli Brinckerhoff &#038; Abady to pay 20 percent of its fee to the plaintiffs' committee.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The long-running fee dispute among attorneys who represented the families of victims of the 1988 bombing of a plane over Lockerbie, Scotland, was brought to an end Tuesday by the 2nd Circuit, which ordered Emery Celli Brinckerhoff &#038; Abady to pay 20 percent of its fee to the plaintiffs&#8217; committee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/circuit-pares-emery-firms-fee-in-favor-of-plaintiffs-committee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paul Weiss, Winston &amp; Strawn Secure Mistrial for Philip Morris in Missouri Light Cigarettes Class Action</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/paul-weiss-winston-strawn-secure-mistrial-for-philip-morris-in-missouri-light-cigarettes-class-action/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/paul-weiss-winston-strawn-secure-mistrial-for-philip-morris-in-missouri-light-cigarettes-class-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 06:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[altria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[four-days]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[its-cigarettes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge-on-tuesday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philip-morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-jury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violated-state]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/paul-weiss-winston-strawn-secure-mistrial-for-philip-morris-in-missouri-light-cigarettes-class-action/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Missouri judge on Tuesday declared a mistrial in a $700 million class action against Altria Group's Philip Morris USA. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Missouri judge on Tuesday declared a mistrial in a $700 million class action against Altria Group&#8217;s Philip Morris USA. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/paul-weiss-winston-strawn-secure-mistrial-for-philip-morris-in-missouri-light-cigarettes-class-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge Sides with Orrick in Nvidia Securities Class Action, Rejects &#8216;Core Operations&#8217; Theory of Scienter</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-sides-with-orrick-in-nvidia-securities-class-action-rejects-core-operations-theory-of-scienter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-sides-with-orrick-in-nvidia-securities-class-action-rejects-core-operations-theory-of-scienter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 03:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class-action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[over-product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiffs-hadn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power-laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-problem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-sides-with-orrick-in-nvidia-securities-class-action-rejects-core-operations-theory-of-scienter/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A California federal judge has dismissed a shareholder class action over product defects in Nvidia chips used to power laptops, concluding the plaintiffs hadn't met the burden of showing that the company deliberately concealed the extent of the problem from investors.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A California federal judge has dismissed a shareholder class action over product defects in Nvidia chips used to power laptops, concluding the plaintiffs hadn&#8217;t met the burden of showing that the company deliberately concealed the extent of the problem from investors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-sides-with-orrick-in-nvidia-securities-class-action-rejects-core-operations-theory-of-scienter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goodwin Procter Knocks Out Massive Class of Subprime Borrowers in Case Against Countrywide and Bank of America</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/goodwin-procter-knocks-out-massive-class-of-subprime-borrowers-in-case-against-countrywide-and-bank-of-america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/goodwin-procter-knocks-out-massive-class-of-subprime-borrowers-in-case-against-countrywide-and-bank-of-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 07:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[came-down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[countrywide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plead-class]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proposed-class]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-requirements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/goodwin-procter-knocks-out-massive-class-of-subprime-borrowers-in-case-against-countrywide-and-bank-of-america/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A California federal judge has knocked out a proposed class of more than 500,000 Countrywide borrowers. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A California federal judge has knocked out a proposed class of more than 500,000 Countrywide borrowers. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/goodwin-procter-knocks-out-massive-class-of-subprime-borrowers-in-case-against-countrywide-and-bank-of-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dechert, Simpson Thacher Win Dismissal of Lehman ERISA Class Action</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/dechert-simpson-thacher-win-dismissal-of-lehman-erisa-class-action/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/dechert-simpson-thacher-win-dismissal-of-lehman-erisa-class-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 04:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy-case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class-action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defendants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[erisa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[held-responsible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lehman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lehman-brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[still-hadn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-defendants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-plaintiffs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/dechert-simpson-thacher-win-dismissal-of-lehman-erisa-class-action/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy case, a federal judge has granted motions to dismiss an ERISA class action for good, concluding that the plaintiffs still hadn't shown that the defendants should be held responsible for losses suffered by participants in Lehman's retirement plan.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy case, a federal judge has granted motions to dismiss an ERISA class action for good, concluding that the plaintiffs still hadn&#8217;t shown that the defendants should be held responsible for losses suffered by participants in Lehman&#8217;s retirement plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/dechert-simpson-thacher-win-dismissal-of-lehman-erisa-class-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dole Praises Opponents at Provost Umphrey in Announcing Settlement with Nicaraguan Plantation Workers</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/dole-praises-opponents-at-provost-umphrey-in-announcing-settlement-with-nicaraguan-plantation-workers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/dole-praises-opponents-at-provost-umphrey-in-announcing-settlement-with-nicaraguan-plantation-workers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 04:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nicaraguan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[provost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[provost-umphrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tuesday]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/dole-praises-opponents-at-provost-umphrey-in-announcing-settlement-with-nicaraguan-plantation-workers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dole Food Co. hasn't had much good to say about the plaintiffs lawyers who've sued it on behalf of Nicaraguan plantation workers. But on Tuesday, Dole issued a surprisingly complimentary statement about Provost Umphrey in announcing a settlement with the firm's clients.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dole Food Co. hasn&#8217;t had much good to say about the plaintiffs lawyers who&#8217;ve sued it on behalf of Nicaraguan plantation workers. But on Tuesday, Dole issued a surprisingly complimentary statement about Provost Umphrey in announcing a settlement with the firm&#8217;s clients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/dole-praises-opponents-at-provost-umphrey-in-announcing-settlement-with-nicaraguan-plantation-workers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mercedes Faces Class Action Alleging Defective Camshafts in Prime Engines</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/mercedes-faces-class-action-alleging-defective-camshafts-in-prime-engines/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/mercedes-faces-class-action-alleging-defective-camshafts-in-prime-engines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 05:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allegedly-defective]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carmaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defective-camshafts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[draining-owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drivers-racing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[premature-wear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[putative-class]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-carmaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-plaintiffs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/mercedes-faces-class-action-alleging-defective-camshafts-in-prime-engines/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An allegedly defective motor has some Mercedes-Benz drivers racing to court. In a putative class action, the plaintiffs allege that the carmaker's top-of-the-line performance engine is prone to premature wear due to defective camshafts, draining owners' and lessees' wallets.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An allegedly defective motor has some Mercedes-Benz drivers racing to court. In a putative class action, the plaintiffs allege that the carmaker&#8217;s top-of-the-line performance engine is prone to premature wear due to defective camshafts, draining owners&#8217; and lessees&#8217; wallets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/mercedes-faces-class-action-alleging-defective-camshafts-in-prime-engines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Illinois Supreme Court Keeps Plaintiffs&#8217; Hopes Alive for Reviving $10 Billion Case Against Philip Morris</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/illinois-supreme-court-keeps-plaintiffs-hopes-alive-for-reviving-10-billion-case-against-philip-morris/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/illinois-supreme-court-keeps-plaintiffs-hopes-alive-for-reviving-10-billion-case-against-philip-morris/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 05:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[down-the-plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illinois-supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[korein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers-at-korein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winston]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/illinois-supreme-court-keeps-plaintiffs-hopes-alive-for-reviving-10-billion-case-against-philip-morris/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In what plaintiffs lawyers at Korein Tillery are calling a "momentous victory," the Illinois Supreme Court has refused to hear an appeal by Philip Morris' lawyers at Winston &#038; Strawn and Mayer Brown that might have shot down the plaintiffs' case for good.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In what plaintiffs lawyers at Korein Tillery are calling a &#8220;momentous victory,&#8221; the Illinois Supreme Court has refused to hear an appeal by Philip Morris&#8217; lawyers at Winston &#038; Strawn and Mayer Brown that might have shot down the plaintiffs&#8217; case for good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/illinois-supreme-court-keeps-plaintiffs-hopes-alive-for-reviving-10-billion-case-against-philip-morris/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sidley Wins Dismissal of Hartford Insurance Securities Suit, Citing Absence of Confidential Sources</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/sidley-wins-dismissal-of-hartford-insurance-securities-suit-citing-absence-of-confidential-sources/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/sidley-wins-dismissal-of-hartford-insurance-securities-suit-citing-absence-of-confidential-sources/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 07:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hartford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hartford-financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal-documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[losses-due]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiffs-didn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[services-group]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/sidley-wins-dismissal-of-hartford-insurance-securities-suit-citing-absence-of-confidential-sources/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal judge has dismissed with prejudice a securities class action against The Hartford Financial Services Group stemming from losses due to mortgage-backed securities, questioning why the plaintiffs didn't cite any confidential witnesses or internal documents and calling that omission a significant flaw.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A federal judge has dismissed with prejudice a securities class action against The Hartford Financial Services Group stemming from losses due to mortgage-backed securities, questioning why the plaintiffs didn&#8217;t cite any confidential witnesses or internal documents and calling that omission a significant flaw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/sidley-wins-dismissal-of-hartford-insurance-securities-suit-citing-absence-of-confidential-sources/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Circuit Sends Costco Gender Bias Class Back to Judge</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/circuit-sends-costco-gender-bias-class-back-to-judge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/circuit-sends-costco-gender-bias-class-back-to-judge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 21:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circuit-on-friday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender-discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rejected-class]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-plaintiffs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/circuit-sends-costco-gender-bias-class-back-to-judge/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 9th Circuit on Friday rejected class certification in a gender discrimination suit against Costco Wholesale. But the plaintiffs attorneys are calling it a victory.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 9th Circuit on Friday rejected class certification in a gender discrimination suit against Costco Wholesale. But the plaintiffs attorneys are calling it a victory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/circuit-sends-costco-gender-bias-class-back-to-judge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge Revives ERISA Claims in Bear Stearns Case</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-revives-erisa-claims-in-bear-stearns-case-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-revives-erisa-claims-in-bear-stearns-case-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 21:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[address-fatal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consolidated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new-evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revelation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stearns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-consolidated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-revelation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-revives-erisa-claims-in-bear-stearns-case-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal judge has reinstated the ERISA plaintiffs' claims in the consolidated securities class action against Bear Stearns, ruling that a new complaint by the plaintiffs appeared to address fatal shortcomings in their earlier filings, and that "the revelation of new evidence" weighed in favor of allowing them to re-plead.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A federal judge has reinstated the ERISA plaintiffs&#8217; claims in the consolidated securities class action against Bear Stearns, ruling that a new complaint by the plaintiffs appeared to address fatal shortcomings in their earlier filings, and that &#8220;the revelation of new evidence&#8221; weighed in favor of allowing them to re-plead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-revives-erisa-claims-in-bear-stearns-case-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

