Feb 8, 2012 0
Woman Mistakenly Put on ‘No-Fly’ List Can Sue, Appellate Panel Rules
The 9th Circuit has revived a suit by a Stanford Ph.D.
| Independent review site since 2002 | : 45,639 product reviews |
The Legal Book
Guiding you through today's legal questions |
|
|
Traffic Tickets Secrets
Learn how to beat any speeding ticket, with an easy, proven, |
|
![]() |
Civil Records.org
This recognised and trusted online records information provider |
|
![]() |
Reverse Phone Check
Find a comprehensive amount of public records information, just |
|
![]() |
Privacy Control
Protect your identity, prevent phishing scams, spam, adware, spyware |
|
![]() |
Police Oral Interview Coaching
Learn the tools you need to pass the most difficult part of |
|
Feb 8, 2012 0
The 9th Circuit has revived a suit by a Stanford Ph.D.
Jan 4, 2012 0
Does this week’s highly anticipated ruling by an Ecuadorean appellate court upholding a lower court’s $18 billion judgment against Chevron mean that Chevron and Ecuadorean plaintiffs will finally opt to settle the knock-down, drag-out Lago Agrio litigation?
Dec 23, 2011 0
A Pennsylvania court cannot deny judicial authorization to a minor for an abortion purely because the minor did not receive parental consent for the abortion, the state Supreme Court has ruled, vacating a lower court’s denial of an application for “judicial bypass.”
Dec 22, 2011 0
Deepening a split among the federal appeals courts, the 1st Circuit has ruled that a state’s removal of a claim to federal court waives its sovereign immunity only if the removal gives the state an unfair advantage. The ruling affirms a lower court judgment against claims by a police officers’ union.
Dec 21, 2011 0
Intermediaries that facilitate online sharing got some relief Tuesday from the 9th Circuit, which ruled that Veoh, a site showcasing content from major and independent producers, did not have “actual knowledge” of copyright violations because Universal Music Group did not send a notice asking it to yank specific, copyrighted material. The ruling affirms a lower court opinion that a file-sharing provider isn’t liable for damages caused by users transmitting copyrighted material.