<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Legal Book &#187; district-judge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.the-legal-book.com/tag/district-judge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com</link>
	<description>Legal product guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:37:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Judge John Facciola on E-Discovery Training at a Crossroads</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-john-facciola-on-e-discovery-training-at-a-crossroads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-john-facciola-on-e-discovery-training-at-a-crossroads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 04:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[district-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facciola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limited-financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ltn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet-face]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proposes-several]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-governmental]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-john-facciola-on-e-discovery-training-at-a-crossroads/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[D.C. District Judge John Facciola speaks with LTN magazine's editor-in-chief, Monica Bay, about how e-discovery training is at a crossroads, constrained by limited financial resources at the governmental level. He proposes several solutions to address these challenges, particularly when individuals are unable to meet face to face.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D.C. District Judge John Facciola speaks with LTN magazine&#8217;s editor-in-chief, Monica Bay, about how e-discovery training is at a crossroads, constrained by limited financial resources at the governmental level. He proposes several solutions to address these challenges, particularly when individuals are unable to meet face to face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-john-facciola-on-e-discovery-training-at-a-crossroads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2nd Circuit Stresses Limited Power of Courts to Review Extradition</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/2nd-circuit-stresses-limited-power-of-courts-to-review-extradition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/2nd-circuit-stresses-limited-power-of-courts-to-review-extradition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 10:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alleged-flaws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[applicable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts-may]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[district-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[face-murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[only-inquire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-applicable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/2nd-circuit-stresses-limited-power-of-courts-to-review-extradition/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A man can be extradited to Greece to face murder charges, the 2nd Circuit has ruled in concluding that a district judge erred by exceeding her "power to review" alleged flaws in the Greek indictment. The circuit has stressed that courts may only inquire to "ensure that the requirements of the applicable extradition treaty have been satisfied."Visit International News]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A man can be extradited to Greece to face murder charges, the 2nd Circuit has ruled in concluding that a district judge erred by exceeding her &#8220;power to review&#8221; alleged flaws in the Greek indictment. The circuit has stressed that courts may only inquire to &#8220;ensure that the requirements of the applicable extradition treaty have been satisfied.&#8221;Visit International News</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/2nd-circuit-stresses-limited-power-of-courts-to-review-extradition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Illston Sentences Bonds to 30 Days of Monitoring</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/illston-sentences-bonds-to-30-days-of-monitoring/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/illston-sentences-bonds-to-30-days-of-monitoring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 05:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cited-four]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[district-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downgrade-the-sentence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sentence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[two-years]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/illston-sentences-bonds-to-30-days-of-monitoring/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Famed slugger Barry Bonds was sentenced Friday to two years' probation and 30 days of house arrest for obstruction of justice, but U.S. District Judge Susan Illston stayed the sentence, pending Bonds' appeal. Illston cited four reasons from the pre-sentencing report to downgrade the sentence from guidelines.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Famed slugger Barry Bonds was sentenced Friday to two years&#8217; probation and 30 days of house arrest for obstruction of justice, but U.S. District Judge Susan Illston stayed the sentence, pending Bonds&#8217; appeal. Illston cited four reasons from the pre-sentencing report to downgrade the sentence from guidelines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/illston-sentences-bonds-to-30-days-of-monitoring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge Sam Sparks of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-sam-sparks-of-the-u-s-district-court-for-the-western-district-of-texas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-sam-sparks-of-the-u-s-district-court-for-the-western-district-of-texas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 03:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[austin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courtroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[district-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sparks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-role]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-sam-sparks-of-the-u-s-district-court-for-the-western-district-of-texas/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. District Judge Sam Sparks of Austin talks about the role of humor in the courtroom.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. District Judge Sam Sparks of Austin talks about the role of humor in the courtroom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-sam-sparks-of-the-u-s-district-court-for-the-western-district-of-texas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fannie Mae Conservator Loses Bid to Halt Class Action</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/fannie-mae-conservator-loses-bid-to-halt-class-action/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/fannie-mae-conservator-loses-bid-to-halt-class-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 04:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[against-the-mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[district-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[richard-leon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-mortgage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/fannie-mae-conservator-loses-bid-to-halt-class-action/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In early October, Fannie Mae's conservator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, asked a Washington federal judge for a stay in a securities class action against the mortgage giant. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In early October, Fannie Mae&#8217;s conservator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, asked a Washington federal judge for a stay in a securities class action against the mortgage giant. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/fannie-mae-conservator-loses-bid-to-halt-class-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Circuit declines to revisit standard for appellate review of claim construction</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/federal-circuit-declines-to-revisit-standard-for-appellate-review-of-claim-construction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/federal-circuit-declines-to-revisit-standard-for-appellate-review-of-claim-construction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 07:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appellate-review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case-involving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circuit-denied]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[district-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal-circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revisit-its]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruling-on-appellate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seminal-1998]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[split-decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-full]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/federal-circuit-declines-to-revisit-standard-for-appellate-review-of-claim-construction/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Circuit has declined an opportunity to revisit its seminal 1998 ruling on appellate review of claim reconstruction. A split decision by the full circuit denied rehearing of a case involving review of a district judge's decision on the definition of patent claims.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Circuit has declined an opportunity to revisit its seminal 1998 ruling on appellate review of claim reconstruction. A split decision by the full circuit denied rehearing of a case involving review of a district judge&#8217;s decision on the definition of patent claims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/federal-circuit-declines-to-revisit-standard-for-appellate-review-of-claim-construction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court&#8217;s Generic-Drug Decision Doesn&#8217;t Help Removal to Federal Court</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/supreme-courts-generic-drug-decision-doesnt-help-removal-to-federal-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/supreme-courts-generic-drug-decision-doesnt-help-removal-to-federal-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 02:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decision-does]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[district-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[generic-drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not-strengthen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remove-lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state-tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-wake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wake]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/supreme-courts-generic-drug-decision-doesnt-help-removal-to-federal-court/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the wake of a U.S. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the wake of a U.S. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/supreme-courts-generic-drug-decision-doesnt-help-removal-to-federal-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>City Loses 1st Round on Cellphone Warning Law</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/city-loses-1st-round-on-cellphone-warning-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/city-loses-1st-round-on-cellphone-warning-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 20:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[city-attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[closely-watched]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[district-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first-amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first-round]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lost-the-first]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[match-over]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[novel-cellphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[over-the-city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thursday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[william-alsup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/city-loses-1st-round-on-cellphone-warning-law/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The San Francisco city attorney's office has lost the first round in what promises to be a closely watched match over the city's novel cellphone "right to know" ordinance. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The San Francisco city attorney&#8217;s office has lost the first round in what promises to be a closely watched match over the city&#8217;s novel cellphone &#8220;right to know&#8221; ordinance. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/city-loses-1st-round-on-cellphone-warning-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MDJ Removed From Bench Because of Court Absences, Tardiness</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/mdj-removed-from-bench-because-of-court-absences-tardiness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/mdj-removed-from-bench-because-of-court-absences-tardiness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 20:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bench]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court-116]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[days-over]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[district-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[from-the-bench]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[habitually-arriving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial-discipline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telling-staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[two-year-period]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/mdj-removed-from-bench-because-of-court-absences-tardiness/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Pennsylvania Court of Judicial Discipline has removed a magisterial district judge from the bench after finding she violated conduct standards and the state constitution by telling staff she would not be coming to court 116 days over a two-year period and, when she did come to court, habitually arriving late.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Pennsylvania Court of Judicial Discipline has removed a magisterial district judge from the bench after finding she violated conduct standards and the state constitution by telling staff she would not be coming to court 116 days over a two-year period and, when she did come to court, habitually arriving late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/mdj-removed-from-bench-because-of-court-absences-tardiness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge Sam Sparks Addresses &quot;Kindergarten Party&quot; Order, Jones&#8217; Email</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-sam-sparks-addresses-kindergarten-party-order-jones-email/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-sam-sparks-addresses-kindergarten-party-order-jones-email/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 07:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[austin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[district-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[his-now]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ignited-over]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sparks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-sam-sparks-addresses-kindergarten-party-order-jones-email/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. District Judge Sam Sparks of Austin, Texas, is not usually one to keep his opinions to himself. So when a controversy ignited over his now famous "Kindergarten Party" order, Sparks was unusually silent -- because he was unaware of it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. District Judge Sam Sparks of Austin, Texas, is not usually one to keep his opinions to himself. So when a controversy ignited over his now famous &#8220;Kindergarten Party&#8221; order, Sparks was unusually silent &#8212; because he was unaware of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-sam-sparks-addresses-kindergarten-party-order-jones-email/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DOJ v. AT&amp;T Antitrust Suit Set For February Trial</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/doj-v-att-antitrust-suit-set-for-february-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/doj-v-att-antitrust-suit-set-for-february-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 07:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[district-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ellen-segal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hear-the-government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[huvelle-on-wednesday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proposed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[segal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trial-date]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violates-antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wednesday]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/doj-v-att-antitrust-suit-set-for-february-trial/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/doj-v-att-antitrust-suit-set-for-february-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For Oracle, Google Lawyers, a Trial by Fire</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/for-oracle-google-lawyers-a-trial-by-fire/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/for-oracle-google-lawyers-a-trial-by-fire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 05:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alsup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[away-on-oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[district-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[giant-patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google-alsup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers-toiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[looming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[probably-greater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech-showdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-looming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/for-oracle-google-lawyers-a-trial-by-fire/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/for-oracle-google-lawyers-a-trial-by-fire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MDJ Faces Sanctions for Missing Court 116 Times</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/mdj-faces-sanctions-for-missing-court-116-times/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/mdj-faces-sanctions-for-missing-court-116-times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 10:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court-116]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[days-over]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[district-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[habitually-arriving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state-constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[two-year-period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violated-the-state]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/mdj-faces-sanctions-for-missing-court-116-times/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Pennsylvania magisterial district judge violated the state constitution and standard of conduct for MDJs by telling her staff that she would not be coming to court 116 days over a two-year period and, when she did come to court, habitually arriving tardily, a state disciplinary body has ruled.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Pennsylvania magisterial district judge violated the state constitution and standard of conduct for MDJs by telling her staff that she would not be coming to court 116 days over a two-year period and, when she did come to court, habitually arriving tardily, a state disciplinary body has ruled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/mdj-faces-sanctions-for-missing-court-116-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil Contempt Finding In Ted Stevens Case Was Proper, Lawyer Says</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/civil-contempt-finding-in-ted-stevens-case-was-proper-lawyer-says/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/civil-contempt-finding-in-ted-stevens-case-was-proper-lawyer-says/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 21:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case-were]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil-contempt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court-should]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[district-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal-appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not-disturb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[timely-disclose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trial-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[two-prosecutors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/civil-contempt-finding-in-ted-stevens-case-was-proper-lawyer-says/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal appeals court should not disturb a trial judge's finding that two prosecutors in the Ted Stevens case were in civil contempt for failing to timely disclose documents, according to Steven Goldblatt, the law professor appointed by the D.C. Circuit to represent the interests of U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A federal appeals court should not disturb a trial judge&#8217;s finding that two prosecutors in the Ted Stevens case were in civil contempt for failing to timely disclose documents, according to Steven Goldblatt, the law professor appointed by the D.C. Circuit to represent the interests of U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/civil-contempt-finding-in-ted-stevens-case-was-proper-lawyer-says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona judicial nominee put on fast track</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/arizona-judicial-nominee-put-on-fast-track/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/arizona-judicial-nominee-put-on-fast-track/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 04:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[district-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hearing-on-wednesday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge-jennifer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[only-five]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quickened-pace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wednesday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zipps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/arizona-judicial-nominee-put-on-fast-track/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Senate is moving at a quickened pace to fill the vacancy left by the shooting death of U.S. District Judge John Roll of Arizona, holding U.S. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Senate is moving at a quickened pace to fill the vacancy left by the shooting death of U.S. District Judge John Roll of Arizona, holding U.S. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/arizona-judicial-nominee-put-on-fast-track/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prop 8 Opponents Defend Walker&#8217;s Showing of Trial Video</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/prop-8-opponents-defend-walkers-showing-of-trial-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/prop-8-opponents-defend-walkers-showing-of-trial-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 03:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[district-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[force-him]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hand-over]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/prop-8-opponents-defend-walkers-showing-of-trial-video/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plaintiffs in the Proposition 8 case have come to the defense of former U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker, firing back against a motion to force him to hand over his video recording of the trial.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plaintiffs in the Proposition 8 case have come to the defense of former U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker, firing back against a motion to force him to hand over his video recording of the trial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/prop-8-opponents-defend-walkers-showing-of-trial-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Walker Defends Hitting &#8216;Play&#8217; on Prop 8 Video</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/walker-defends-hitting-play-on-prop-8-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/walker-defends-hitting-play-on-prop-8-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 04:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[considered-the-recording]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[district-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[his-decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[his-judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[show-footage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trial-at-public]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vaughn-walker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/walker-defends-hitting-play-on-prop-8-video/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a letter to the 9th Circuit, former U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker has defended his decision to show footage of the Proposition 8 trial at public events, saying he considered the recording part of his judicial papers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a letter to the 9th Circuit, former U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker has defended his decision to show footage of the Proposition 8 trial at public events, saying he considered the recording part of his judicial papers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/walker-defends-hitting-play-on-prop-8-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marshals Service can sell rest of Rothstein&#8217;s seized property</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/marshals-service-can-sell-rest-of-rothsteins-seized-property/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/marshals-service-can-sell-rest-of-rothsteins-seized-property/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 04:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[district-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[final-forfeiture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[giving-the-green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[items]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[order-giving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ponzi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scott-rothstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-green]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/marshals-service-can-sell-rest-of-rothsteins-seized-property/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/marshals-service-can-sell-rest-of-rothsteins-seized-property/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge Vacates Predecessor&#8217;s Order for New Trial in Legal-Mal Case</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-vacates-predecessors-order-for-new-trial-in-legal-mal-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-vacates-predecessors-order-for-new-trial-in-legal-mal-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 04:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[district]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[district-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[former-55th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[houston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kevin-leyendecker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leyendecker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shadwick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-plaintiff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-vacates-predecessors-order-for-new-trial-in-legal-mal-case/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Jan. 24, 55th District Judge Jeff Shadwick of Houston vacated an order for new trial in a legal-malpractice case. That's unusual, because the order was signed in September 2010 by Shadwick's predecessor, former 55th District Judge Dion Ramos, who lost to Shadwick in the November 2010 election. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Jan. 24, 55th District Judge Jeff Shadwick of Houston vacated an order for new trial in a legal-malpractice case. That&#8217;s unusual, because the order was signed in September 2010 by Shadwick&#8217;s predecessor, former 55th District Judge Dion Ramos, who lost to Shadwick in the November 2010 election. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/judge-vacates-predecessors-order-for-new-trial-in-legal-mal-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona&#8217;s Chief Federal Judge Among Shooting Victims</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/arizonas-chief-federal-judge-among-shooting-victims/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/arizonas-chief-federal-judge-among-shooting-victims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 12:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[district-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gabrielle-giffords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[giffords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intent-on-assassinating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mourned-the-loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saturday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-hands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-loss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/arizonas-chief-federal-judge-among-shooting-victims/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The death Saturday of U.S. District Judge John M. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The death Saturday of U.S. District Judge John M. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/arizonas-chief-federal-judge-among-shooting-victims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former Federal Judge&#8217;s Request to Vacate 33-Month Sentence Denied</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/former-federal-judges-request-to-vacate-33-month-sentence-denied/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/former-federal-judges-request-to-vacate-33-month-sentence-denied/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 08:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aside-or-correct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[district-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sentence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/former-federal-judges-request-to-vacate-33-month-sentence-denied/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal judge has denied former U.S. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A federal judge has denied former U.S. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/former-federal-judges-request-to-vacate-33-month-sentence-denied/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate Votes to Remove La. Federal Judge</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/senate-votes-to-remove-la-federal-judge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/senate-votes-to-remove-la-federal-judge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 22:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bench]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[district-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eighth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[four-articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[from-the-bench]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-bench]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-eighth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thomas-porteous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[today-convicted]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/senate-votes-to-remove-la-federal-judge/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Senate today convicted U.S. District Judge G. Thomas Porteous Jr]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Senate today convicted U.S. District Judge G. Thomas Porteous Jr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/senate-votes-to-remove-la-federal-judge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prop 8 judge to teach at UC-Berkeley</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/prop-8-judge-to-teach-at-uc-berkeley/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/prop-8-judge-to-teach-at-uc-berkeley/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 05:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[berkeley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[district-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex-marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[striking-down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vaughn-walker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[will-teach]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/prop-8-judge-to-teach-at-uc-berkeley/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/prop-8-judge-to-teach-at-uc-berkeley/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JCB Charges MDJ With Tardiness, &#8216;Bizarre&#8217; Behavior</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/jcb-charges-mdj-with-tardiness-bizarre-behavior/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/jcb-charges-mdj-with-tardiness-bizarre-behavior/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 04:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[district-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frequently-not]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial-conduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial-demeanor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lehigh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lehigh-county]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work-on-time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/jcb-charges-mdj-with-tardiness-bizarre-behavior/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The state's Judicial Conduct Board has filed charges against a Lehigh County magisterial district judge accused of frequently not showing up for work on time or at all, and improper judicial demeanor, including "nasty" and "irrational" mood swings.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The state&#8217;s Judicial Conduct Board has filed charges against a Lehigh County magisterial district judge accused of frequently not showing up for work on time or at all, and improper judicial demeanor, including &#8220;nasty&#8221; and &#8220;irrational&#8221; mood swings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/jcb-charges-mdj-with-tardiness-bizarre-behavior/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court Upholds Dismissal of Tax-Advice Suit Against Proskauer Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/court-upholds-dismissal-of-tax-advice-suit-against-proskauer-rose/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/court-upholds-dismissal-of-tax-advice-suit-against-proskauer-rose/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2010 18:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009-decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circuit-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[district-judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud-suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good-news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lower-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panel-upheld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proskauer-rose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[southern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suit-filed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/court-upholds-dismissal-of-tax-advice-suit-against-proskauer-rose/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proskauer Rose got some good news Oct. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proskauer Rose got some good news Oct. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-legal-book.com/uncategorized/court-upholds-dismissal-of-tax-advice-suit-against-proskauer-rose/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

